NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Ingram, Maia; Sabo, Samantha; Redondo, Floribella; Soto, Yanitza; Russell, Kim; Carter, Heather; Bender, Brook; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey Establishing voluntary certification of community health workers in Arizona: a policy case study of building a unified workforce Journal Article Human Resources for Health, 18 (46), 2020. @article{Ingram2020, title = {Establishing voluntary certification of community health workers in Arizona: a policy case study of building a unified workforce}, author = {Maia Ingram and Samantha Sabo and Floribella Redondo and Yanitza Soto and Kim Russell and Heather Carter and Brook Bender and Jill Guernsey de Zapien }, url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00487-7}, doi = {10.1186/s12960-020-00487-7}, year = {2020}, date = {2020-06-26}, journal = {Human Resources for Health}, volume = {18}, number = {46}, abstract = {Community health workers (CHWs) are widely recognized as essential to addressing disparities in health care delivery and outcomes in US vulnerable populations. In the state of Arizona, the sustainability of the workforce is threatened by low wages, poor job security, and limited opportunities for training and advancement within the profession. CHW voluntary certification offers an avenue to increase the recognition, compensation, training, and standardization of the workforce. However, passing voluntary certification legislation in an anti-regulatory state such as Arizona posed a major challenge that required a robust advocacy effort.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Community health workers (CHWs) are widely recognized as essential to addressing disparities in health care delivery and outcomes in US vulnerable populations. In the state of Arizona, the sustainability of the workforce is threatened by low wages, poor job security, and limited opportunities for training and advancement within the profession. CHW voluntary certification offers an avenue to increase the recognition, compensation, training, and standardization of the workforce. However, passing voluntary certification legislation in an anti-regulatory state such as Arizona posed a major challenge that required a robust advocacy effort. |
Sabo, Samantha; Flores, Melissa; Wennerström, Ashley; Bell, Melanie L; Verdugo, Lorena; Carvajal, Scott; Ingram, Maia Community health workers promote civic engagement and organizational capacity to impact policy Journal Article Journal of Community Health, 42 (6), pp. 1197-1203, 2017. @article{Sabo2017b, title = {Community health workers promote civic engagement and organizational capacity to impact policy}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Melissa Flores and Ashley Wennerström and Melanie L Bell and Lorena Verdugo and Scott Carvajal and Maia Ingram}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10900-017-0370-3}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-06-06}, journal = {Journal of Community Health}, volume = {42}, number = {6}, pages = {1197-1203}, abstract = {Community health workers (CHW) have historically served to link structurally vulnerable populations to broad support systems. Emerging evidence suggests that CHWs engage in various forms of advocacy to promote policy and systems change. We assessed the impact of CHW community advocacy on community change, defined as civic engagement, organizational capacity and policy and systems change. Data are drawn from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (N = 1776) aimed to identify the state of the CHW profession, and their impact on health disparities through community advocacy and policy engagement. Our primary analysis used multiple linear regression to assess the association between CHW advocacy and community change. As predicted, there was a significant, positive association between CHW advocacy and change in community conditions. Additionally, both adjusted and sensitivity models had similar standardized beta estimates for advocacy, and adjusted R 2 statistics. CHW advocacy predicts positive change in community conditions and further advances the CHW Community Advocacy Framework designed to support and monitor CHW community advocacy to reduce health disparities through advocacy and policy change.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Community health workers (CHW) have historically served to link structurally vulnerable populations to broad support systems. Emerging evidence suggests that CHWs engage in various forms of advocacy to promote policy and systems change. We assessed the impact of CHW community advocacy on community change, defined as civic engagement, organizational capacity and policy and systems change. Data are drawn from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (N = 1776) aimed to identify the state of the CHW profession, and their impact on health disparities through community advocacy and policy engagement. Our primary analysis used multiple linear regression to assess the association between CHW advocacy and community change. As predicted, there was a significant, positive association between CHW advocacy and change in community conditions. Additionally, both adjusted and sensitivity models had similar standardized beta estimates for advocacy, and adjusted R 2 statistics. CHW advocacy predicts positive change in community conditions and further advances the CHW Community Advocacy Framework designed to support and monitor CHW community advocacy to reduce health disparities through advocacy and policy change. |
Evenson, Kelly R; Brown, David R; Pearce, Emily; Camplain, Ricky; Jernigan, Jan; Epping, Jacqueline; Shepard, Dennis M; Dorn, Joan M Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners Journal Article Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87 (2), pp. 207-213, 2016. @article{Evenson2016, title = {Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners}, author = {Kelly R Evenson and David R Brown and Emily Pearce and Ricky Camplain and Jan Jernigan and Jacqueline Epping and Dennis M Shepard and Joan M Dorn}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946847/}, doi = {10.1080/02701367.2016.1146942}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-01}, journal = {Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport}, volume = {87}, number = {2}, pages = {207-213}, abstract = {From 1996 to 2013, a 6-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners has been offered yearly in the United States. An evaluation was conducted to assess the impact of the course on building public health capacity for physical activity and on shaping the physical activity and public health careers of fellows since taking the courses. METHOD: An evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings and surveyed fellows. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2012, 410 fellows attended the course, and in 2013, 186 participated in the Web-based survey (56% response rate). The number of fellows attending the course ranged from 15 to 33 yearly. From 1996 to 2012, the course averaged 38 hr of instructional time that included topics on interventions and environment/policy work to increase physical activity, program evaluation, public health research, and health disparities. The course included consultations, collaborative work, and field-based experiences. Fellows who participated in the survey agreed that the course had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), met their expectations (96%), helped them with research/practice collaborations with other physical activity professionals (96%), assisted them in conducting higher-quality interventions/programs (95%), helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%), and had a positive impact on other work they did (91%). Following the course, 66% and 56% had further contact with faculty and other fellows, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners made important contributions toward building the capacity of physical activity and public health practitioners.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } From 1996 to 2013, a 6-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners has been offered yearly in the United States. An evaluation was conducted to assess the impact of the course on building public health capacity for physical activity and on shaping the physical activity and public health careers of fellows since taking the courses. METHOD: An evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings and surveyed fellows. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2012, 410 fellows attended the course, and in 2013, 186 participated in the Web-based survey (56% response rate). The number of fellows attending the course ranged from 15 to 33 yearly. From 1996 to 2012, the course averaged 38 hr of instructional time that included topics on interventions and environment/policy work to increase physical activity, program evaluation, public health research, and health disparities. The course included consultations, collaborative work, and field-based experiences. Fellows who participated in the survey agreed that the course had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), met their expectations (96%), helped them with research/practice collaborations with other physical activity professionals (96%), assisted them in conducting higher-quality interventions/programs (95%), helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%), and had a positive impact on other work they did (91%). Following the course, 66% and 56% had further contact with faculty and other fellows, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners made important contributions toward building the capacity of physical activity and public health practitioners. |
Sabo, Samantha; Wennerstrom, Ashley; Phillips, David; Haywoord, Catherine; Redondo, Floribella; Bell, Melanie L; Ingram, Maia Community Health Worker Professional Advocacy: Voices of Action from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey Journal Article The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 38 (2), pp. 225-235, 2015. @article{Sabo2015, title = {Community Health Worker Professional Advocacy: Voices of Action from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Ashley Wennerstrom and David Phillips and Catherine Haywoord and Floribella Redondo and Melanie L Bell and Maia Ingram}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26049652}, doi = {10.1097/JAC.0000000000000089}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-01}, journal = {The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management}, volume = {38}, number = {2}, pages = {225-235}, abstract = {This mixed-methods study explores community health worker (CHW) engagement in professional advocacy. Data from the National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (n = 1661) assessed the relationship between CHW professional advocacy and CHW demographics, and work characteristics. Qualitative data articulated the quality of professional advocacy efforts. Approximately, 30% of CHW respondents advocated for professional advancement or collaborated with other CHWs to advance the workforce. Advocacy was more prevalent among CHWs affiliated with a professional network. CHW advocacy targeted recognition of the field, appropriate training and compensation, and sustainable funding. CHW professional advocacy is imperative to advancement of the field.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This mixed-methods study explores community health worker (CHW) engagement in professional advocacy. Data from the National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (n = 1661) assessed the relationship between CHW professional advocacy and CHW demographics, and work characteristics. Qualitative data articulated the quality of professional advocacy efforts. Approximately, 30% of CHW respondents advocated for professional advancement or collaborated with other CHWs to advance the workforce. Advocacy was more prevalent among CHWs affiliated with a professional network. CHW advocacy targeted recognition of the field, appropriate training and compensation, and sustainable funding. CHW professional advocacy is imperative to advancement of the field. |
Evenson, Kelly R; Dorn, Joan M; Camplain, Ricky; Pate, Russell R; Brown, David R Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers Journal Article Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12 (8), pp. 1052-1060, 2015, ISBN: 1543-3080. @article{Evenson2015, title = {Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers}, author = {Kelly R Evenson and Joan M Dorn and Ricky Camplain and Russell R Pate and David R Brown}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949596/}, doi = {10.1123/jpah.2014-0284}, isbn = {1543-3080}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-01}, journal = {Journal of Physical Activity and Health}, volume = {12}, number = {8}, pages = {1052-1060}, abstract = {Background Since 1995, an 8-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers has been offered yearly in the United States. Methods In 2013, an evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings, surveyed fellows on course impact, documented grant funding, and identified fellow participation on leading physical activity-related journals. Results The number of fellows that attended the course ranged from 20–35/year. Fellows who participated in the web survey (n=322) agreed that the course: met their expectations (99%), had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), and helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%). Following the course, 73% of fellows had further contact with course faculty and 71% had further contact with other fellows. From the National Institutes of Health, 117 grants were awarded to 82 fellows (21% of eligible fellows). Out of 14 journals reviewed, 11 had at least one fellow on their staff as editor, associate editor, or editorial board member. Conclusion The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers helps address a training need by providing instruction and building capacity in the US and abroad for conducting research on physical activity and public health.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Background Since 1995, an 8-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers has been offered yearly in the United States. Methods In 2013, an evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings, surveyed fellows on course impact, documented grant funding, and identified fellow participation on leading physical activity-related journals. Results The number of fellows that attended the course ranged from 20–35/year. Fellows who participated in the web survey (n=322) agreed that the course: met their expectations (99%), had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), and helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%). Following the course, 73% of fellows had further contact with course faculty and 71% had further contact with other fellows. From the National Institutes of Health, 117 grants were awarded to 82 fellows (21% of eligible fellows). Out of 14 journals reviewed, 11 had at least one fellow on their staff as editor, associate editor, or editorial board member. Conclusion The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers helps address a training need by providing instruction and building capacity in the US and abroad for conducting research on physical activity and public health. |
Ingram, Maia; Sabo, Samantha; Rothers, Janet; Wennerstrom, Ashley; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey Community Health Workers and community advocacy: addressing health disparities Journal Article Journal of Community Health, 33 (6), pp. 417-424, 2008. @article{Ingram2008, title = {Community Health Workers and community advocacy: addressing health disparities}, author = {Maia Ingram and Samantha Sabo and Janet Rothers and Ashley Wennerstrom and Jill Guernsey de Zapien}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18584315}, doi = {10.1007/s10900-008-9111-y}, year = {2008}, date = {2008-12-01}, journal = {Journal of Community Health}, volume = {33}, number = {6}, pages = {417-424}, abstract = {The Community Health Worker model is recognized nationally as a means to address glaring inequities in the burden of adverse health conditions that exist among specific population groups in the United States. This study explored Arizona CHW involvement in advocacy beyond the individual patient level into the realm of advocating for community level change as a mechanism to reduce the structural underpinnings of health disparities. A survey of CHWs in Arizona found that CHWs advocate at local, state and federal political levels as well as within health and social service agencies and business. Characteristics significantly associated with advocacy include employment in a not for profit organization, previous leadership training, and a work environment that allows flexible work hours and the autonomy to start new projects at work. Intrinsic characteristics of CHWs associated with advocacy include their belief that they can influence community decisions, self perception that they are leaders in the community, and knowledge of who to talk to in their community to make change. Community-level advocacy has been identified as a core CHW function and has the potential to address structural issues such as poverty, employment, housing, and discrimination. Agencies utilizing the CHW model could encourage community advocacy by providing a flexible working environment, ongoing leadership training, and opportunities to collaborate with both veteran CHWs and local community leaders. Further research is needed to understand the nature and impact of CHW community advocacy activities on both systems change and health outcomes.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The Community Health Worker model is recognized nationally as a means to address glaring inequities in the burden of adverse health conditions that exist among specific population groups in the United States. This study explored Arizona CHW involvement in advocacy beyond the individual patient level into the realm of advocating for community level change as a mechanism to reduce the structural underpinnings of health disparities. A survey of CHWs in Arizona found that CHWs advocate at local, state and federal political levels as well as within health and social service agencies and business. Characteristics significantly associated with advocacy include employment in a not for profit organization, previous leadership training, and a work environment that allows flexible work hours and the autonomy to start new projects at work. Intrinsic characteristics of CHWs associated with advocacy include their belief that they can influence community decisions, self perception that they are leaders in the community, and knowledge of who to talk to in their community to make change. Community-level advocacy has been identified as a core CHW function and has the potential to address structural issues such as poverty, employment, housing, and discrimination. Agencies utilizing the CHW model could encourage community advocacy by providing a flexible working environment, ongoing leadership training, and opportunities to collaborate with both veteran CHWs and local community leaders. Further research is needed to understand the nature and impact of CHW community advocacy activities on both systems change and health outcomes. |
2020 |
Ingram, Maia; Sabo, Samantha; Redondo, Floribella; Soto, Yanitza; Russell, Kim; Carter, Heather; Bender, Brook; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey Establishing voluntary certification of community health workers in Arizona: a policy case study of building a unified workforce Journal Article Human Resources for Health, 18 (46), 2020. @article{Ingram2020, title = {Establishing voluntary certification of community health workers in Arizona: a policy case study of building a unified workforce}, author = {Maia Ingram and Samantha Sabo and Floribella Redondo and Yanitza Soto and Kim Russell and Heather Carter and Brook Bender and Jill Guernsey de Zapien }, url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00487-7}, doi = {10.1186/s12960-020-00487-7}, year = {2020}, date = {2020-06-26}, journal = {Human Resources for Health}, volume = {18}, number = {46}, abstract = {Community health workers (CHWs) are widely recognized as essential to addressing disparities in health care delivery and outcomes in US vulnerable populations. In the state of Arizona, the sustainability of the workforce is threatened by low wages, poor job security, and limited opportunities for training and advancement within the profession. CHW voluntary certification offers an avenue to increase the recognition, compensation, training, and standardization of the workforce. However, passing voluntary certification legislation in an anti-regulatory state such as Arizona posed a major challenge that required a robust advocacy effort.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Community health workers (CHWs) are widely recognized as essential to addressing disparities in health care delivery and outcomes in US vulnerable populations. In the state of Arizona, the sustainability of the workforce is threatened by low wages, poor job security, and limited opportunities for training and advancement within the profession. CHW voluntary certification offers an avenue to increase the recognition, compensation, training, and standardization of the workforce. However, passing voluntary certification legislation in an anti-regulatory state such as Arizona posed a major challenge that required a robust advocacy effort. |
2017 |
Sabo, Samantha; Flores, Melissa; Wennerström, Ashley; Bell, Melanie L; Verdugo, Lorena; Carvajal, Scott; Ingram, Maia Community health workers promote civic engagement and organizational capacity to impact policy Journal Article Journal of Community Health, 42 (6), pp. 1197-1203, 2017. @article{Sabo2017b, title = {Community health workers promote civic engagement and organizational capacity to impact policy}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Melissa Flores and Ashley Wennerström and Melanie L Bell and Lorena Verdugo and Scott Carvajal and Maia Ingram}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10900-017-0370-3}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-06-06}, journal = {Journal of Community Health}, volume = {42}, number = {6}, pages = {1197-1203}, abstract = {Community health workers (CHW) have historically served to link structurally vulnerable populations to broad support systems. Emerging evidence suggests that CHWs engage in various forms of advocacy to promote policy and systems change. We assessed the impact of CHW community advocacy on community change, defined as civic engagement, organizational capacity and policy and systems change. Data are drawn from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (N = 1776) aimed to identify the state of the CHW profession, and their impact on health disparities through community advocacy and policy engagement. Our primary analysis used multiple linear regression to assess the association between CHW advocacy and community change. As predicted, there was a significant, positive association between CHW advocacy and change in community conditions. Additionally, both adjusted and sensitivity models had similar standardized beta estimates for advocacy, and adjusted R 2 statistics. CHW advocacy predicts positive change in community conditions and further advances the CHW Community Advocacy Framework designed to support and monitor CHW community advocacy to reduce health disparities through advocacy and policy change.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Community health workers (CHW) have historically served to link structurally vulnerable populations to broad support systems. Emerging evidence suggests that CHWs engage in various forms of advocacy to promote policy and systems change. We assessed the impact of CHW community advocacy on community change, defined as civic engagement, organizational capacity and policy and systems change. Data are drawn from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (N = 1776) aimed to identify the state of the CHW profession, and their impact on health disparities through community advocacy and policy engagement. Our primary analysis used multiple linear regression to assess the association between CHW advocacy and community change. As predicted, there was a significant, positive association between CHW advocacy and change in community conditions. Additionally, both adjusted and sensitivity models had similar standardized beta estimates for advocacy, and adjusted R 2 statistics. CHW advocacy predicts positive change in community conditions and further advances the CHW Community Advocacy Framework designed to support and monitor CHW community advocacy to reduce health disparities through advocacy and policy change. |
2016 |
Evenson, Kelly R; Brown, David R; Pearce, Emily; Camplain, Ricky; Jernigan, Jan; Epping, Jacqueline; Shepard, Dennis M; Dorn, Joan M Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners Journal Article Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87 (2), pp. 207-213, 2016. @article{Evenson2016, title = {Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners}, author = {Kelly R Evenson and David R Brown and Emily Pearce and Ricky Camplain and Jan Jernigan and Jacqueline Epping and Dennis M Shepard and Joan M Dorn}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4946847/}, doi = {10.1080/02701367.2016.1146942}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-06-01}, journal = {Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport}, volume = {87}, number = {2}, pages = {207-213}, abstract = {From 1996 to 2013, a 6-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners has been offered yearly in the United States. An evaluation was conducted to assess the impact of the course on building public health capacity for physical activity and on shaping the physical activity and public health careers of fellows since taking the courses. METHOD: An evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings and surveyed fellows. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2012, 410 fellows attended the course, and in 2013, 186 participated in the Web-based survey (56% response rate). The number of fellows attending the course ranged from 15 to 33 yearly. From 1996 to 2012, the course averaged 38 hr of instructional time that included topics on interventions and environment/policy work to increase physical activity, program evaluation, public health research, and health disparities. The course included consultations, collaborative work, and field-based experiences. Fellows who participated in the survey agreed that the course had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), met their expectations (96%), helped them with research/practice collaborations with other physical activity professionals (96%), assisted them in conducting higher-quality interventions/programs (95%), helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%), and had a positive impact on other work they did (91%). Following the course, 66% and 56% had further contact with faculty and other fellows, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners made important contributions toward building the capacity of physical activity and public health practitioners.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } From 1996 to 2013, a 6-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners has been offered yearly in the United States. An evaluation was conducted to assess the impact of the course on building public health capacity for physical activity and on shaping the physical activity and public health careers of fellows since taking the courses. METHOD: An evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings and surveyed fellows. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2012, 410 fellows attended the course, and in 2013, 186 participated in the Web-based survey (56% response rate). The number of fellows attending the course ranged from 15 to 33 yearly. From 1996 to 2012, the course averaged 38 hr of instructional time that included topics on interventions and environment/policy work to increase physical activity, program evaluation, public health research, and health disparities. The course included consultations, collaborative work, and field-based experiences. Fellows who participated in the survey agreed that the course had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), met their expectations (96%), helped them with research/practice collaborations with other physical activity professionals (96%), assisted them in conducting higher-quality interventions/programs (95%), helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%), and had a positive impact on other work they did (91%). Following the course, 66% and 56% had further contact with faculty and other fellows, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Practitioners made important contributions toward building the capacity of physical activity and public health practitioners. |
2015 |
Sabo, Samantha; Wennerstrom, Ashley; Phillips, David; Haywoord, Catherine; Redondo, Floribella; Bell, Melanie L; Ingram, Maia Community Health Worker Professional Advocacy: Voices of Action from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey Journal Article The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 38 (2), pp. 225-235, 2015. @article{Sabo2015, title = {Community Health Worker Professional Advocacy: Voices of Action from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Ashley Wennerstrom and David Phillips and Catherine Haywoord and Floribella Redondo and Melanie L Bell and Maia Ingram}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26049652}, doi = {10.1097/JAC.0000000000000089}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-01}, journal = {The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management}, volume = {38}, number = {2}, pages = {225-235}, abstract = {This mixed-methods study explores community health worker (CHW) engagement in professional advocacy. Data from the National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (n = 1661) assessed the relationship between CHW professional advocacy and CHW demographics, and work characteristics. Qualitative data articulated the quality of professional advocacy efforts. Approximately, 30% of CHW respondents advocated for professional advancement or collaborated with other CHWs to advance the workforce. Advocacy was more prevalent among CHWs affiliated with a professional network. CHW advocacy targeted recognition of the field, appropriate training and compensation, and sustainable funding. CHW professional advocacy is imperative to advancement of the field.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This mixed-methods study explores community health worker (CHW) engagement in professional advocacy. Data from the National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey (n = 1661) assessed the relationship between CHW professional advocacy and CHW demographics, and work characteristics. Qualitative data articulated the quality of professional advocacy efforts. Approximately, 30% of CHW respondents advocated for professional advancement or collaborated with other CHWs to advance the workforce. Advocacy was more prevalent among CHWs affiliated with a professional network. CHW advocacy targeted recognition of the field, appropriate training and compensation, and sustainable funding. CHW professional advocacy is imperative to advancement of the field. |
Evenson, Kelly R; Dorn, Joan M; Camplain, Ricky; Pate, Russell R; Brown, David R Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers Journal Article Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12 (8), pp. 1052-1060, 2015, ISBN: 1543-3080. @article{Evenson2015, title = {Evaluation of the Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers}, author = {Kelly R Evenson and Joan M Dorn and Ricky Camplain and Russell R Pate and David R Brown}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949596/}, doi = {10.1123/jpah.2014-0284}, isbn = {1543-3080}, year = {2015}, date = {2015-08-01}, journal = {Journal of Physical Activity and Health}, volume = {12}, number = {8}, pages = {1052-1060}, abstract = {Background Since 1995, an 8-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers has been offered yearly in the United States. Methods In 2013, an evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings, surveyed fellows on course impact, documented grant funding, and identified fellow participation on leading physical activity-related journals. Results The number of fellows that attended the course ranged from 20–35/year. Fellows who participated in the web survey (n=322) agreed that the course: met their expectations (99%), had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), and helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%). Following the course, 73% of fellows had further contact with course faculty and 71% had further contact with other fellows. From the National Institutes of Health, 117 grants were awarded to 82 fellows (21% of eligible fellows). Out of 14 journals reviewed, 11 had at least one fellow on their staff as editor, associate editor, or editorial board member. Conclusion The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers helps address a training need by providing instruction and building capacity in the US and abroad for conducting research on physical activity and public health.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Background Since 1995, an 8-day Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers has been offered yearly in the United States. Methods In 2013, an evaluation quantified time that fellows spent in different course offerings, surveyed fellows on course impact, documented grant funding, and identified fellow participation on leading physical activity-related journals. Results The number of fellows that attended the course ranged from 20–35/year. Fellows who participated in the web survey (n=322) agreed that the course: met their expectations (99%), had a positive impact on the physical activity research or practice work they did (98%), and helped increase their professional networking in the field (93%). Following the course, 73% of fellows had further contact with course faculty and 71% had further contact with other fellows. From the National Institutes of Health, 117 grants were awarded to 82 fellows (21% of eligible fellows). Out of 14 journals reviewed, 11 had at least one fellow on their staff as editor, associate editor, or editorial board member. Conclusion The Physical Activity and Public Health Course for Researchers helps address a training need by providing instruction and building capacity in the US and abroad for conducting research on physical activity and public health. |
2008 |
Ingram, Maia; Sabo, Samantha; Rothers, Janet; Wennerstrom, Ashley; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey Community Health Workers and community advocacy: addressing health disparities Journal Article Journal of Community Health, 33 (6), pp. 417-424, 2008. @article{Ingram2008, title = {Community Health Workers and community advocacy: addressing health disparities}, author = {Maia Ingram and Samantha Sabo and Janet Rothers and Ashley Wennerstrom and Jill Guernsey de Zapien}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18584315}, doi = {10.1007/s10900-008-9111-y}, year = {2008}, date = {2008-12-01}, journal = {Journal of Community Health}, volume = {33}, number = {6}, pages = {417-424}, abstract = {The Community Health Worker model is recognized nationally as a means to address glaring inequities in the burden of adverse health conditions that exist among specific population groups in the United States. This study explored Arizona CHW involvement in advocacy beyond the individual patient level into the realm of advocating for community level change as a mechanism to reduce the structural underpinnings of health disparities. A survey of CHWs in Arizona found that CHWs advocate at local, state and federal political levels as well as within health and social service agencies and business. Characteristics significantly associated with advocacy include employment in a not for profit organization, previous leadership training, and a work environment that allows flexible work hours and the autonomy to start new projects at work. Intrinsic characteristics of CHWs associated with advocacy include their belief that they can influence community decisions, self perception that they are leaders in the community, and knowledge of who to talk to in their community to make change. Community-level advocacy has been identified as a core CHW function and has the potential to address structural issues such as poverty, employment, housing, and discrimination. Agencies utilizing the CHW model could encourage community advocacy by providing a flexible working environment, ongoing leadership training, and opportunities to collaborate with both veteran CHWs and local community leaders. Further research is needed to understand the nature and impact of CHW community advocacy activities on both systems change and health outcomes.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } The Community Health Worker model is recognized nationally as a means to address glaring inequities in the burden of adverse health conditions that exist among specific population groups in the United States. This study explored Arizona CHW involvement in advocacy beyond the individual patient level into the realm of advocating for community level change as a mechanism to reduce the structural underpinnings of health disparities. A survey of CHWs in Arizona found that CHWs advocate at local, state and federal political levels as well as within health and social service agencies and business. Characteristics significantly associated with advocacy include employment in a not for profit organization, previous leadership training, and a work environment that allows flexible work hours and the autonomy to start new projects at work. Intrinsic characteristics of CHWs associated with advocacy include their belief that they can influence community decisions, self perception that they are leaders in the community, and knowledge of who to talk to in their community to make change. Community-level advocacy has been identified as a core CHW function and has the potential to address structural issues such as poverty, employment, housing, and discrimination. Agencies utilizing the CHW model could encourage community advocacy by providing a flexible working environment, ongoing leadership training, and opportunities to collaborate with both veteran CHWs and local community leaders. Further research is needed to understand the nature and impact of CHW community advocacy activities on both systems change and health outcomes. |