NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Akintobi, Tabia Henry; Sheikhattari, Payam; Shaffer, Emma; Evans, Christina L; Braun, Kathryn L; Sy, Angela U; Mancera, Bibiana; Campa, Adriana; Miller, Stephania T; Sarpong, Daniel; Holliday, Rhonda; Jimenez-Chavez, Julio; Khan, Shafiq; Hinton, Cimona; Sellars-Bates, Kimberly; Ajewole, Veronica; Teufel-Shone, Nicolette I International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 18 (12), 2021. @article{Akintobi2021, title = {Community Engagement Practices at Research Centers in U.S. Minority Institutions: Priority Populations and Innovative Approaches to Advancing Health Disparities Research}, author = {Tabia Henry Akintobi and Payam Sheikhattari and Emma Shaffer and Christina L. Evans and Kathryn L. Braun and Angela U. Sy and Bibiana Mancera and Adriana Campa and Stephania T. Miller and Daniel Sarpong and Rhonda Holliday and Julio Jimenez-Chavez and Shafiq Khan and Cimona Hinton and Kimberly Sellars-Bates and Veronica Ajewole and Nicolette I. Teufel-Shone}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126675}, doi = {10.3390/ijerph18126675}, year = {2021}, date = {2021-06-21}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health }, volume = {18}, number = {12}, abstract = {This paper details U.S. Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Community Engagement Cores (CECs): (1) unique and cross-cutting components, focus areas, specific aims, and target populations; and (2) approaches utilized to build or sustain trust towards community participation in research. A mixed-method data collection approach was employed for this cross-sectional study of current or previously funded RCMIs. A total of 18 of the 25 institutions spanning 13 U.S. states and territories participated. CEC specific aims were to support community engaged research (94%); to translate and disseminate research findings (88%); to develop partnerships (82%); and to build capacity around community research (71%). Four open-ended questions, qualitative analysis, and comparison of the categories led to the emergence of two supporting themes: (1) establishing trust between the community-academic collaborators and within the community and (2) building collaborative relationships. An overarching theme, building community together through trust and meaningful collaborations, emerged from the supporting themes and subthemes. The RCMI institutions and their CECs serve as models to circumvent the historical and current challenges to research in communities disproportionately affected by health disparities. Lessons learned from these cores may help other institutions who want to build community trust in and capacities for research that addresses community-related health concerns.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper details U.S. Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Community Engagement Cores (CECs): (1) unique and cross-cutting components, focus areas, specific aims, and target populations; and (2) approaches utilized to build or sustain trust towards community participation in research. A mixed-method data collection approach was employed for this cross-sectional study of current or previously funded RCMIs. A total of 18 of the 25 institutions spanning 13 U.S. states and territories participated. CEC specific aims were to support community engaged research (94%); to translate and disseminate research findings (88%); to develop partnerships (82%); and to build capacity around community research (71%). Four open-ended questions, qualitative analysis, and comparison of the categories led to the emergence of two supporting themes: (1) establishing trust between the community-academic collaborators and within the community and (2) building collaborative relationships. An overarching theme, building community together through trust and meaningful collaborations, emerged from the supporting themes and subthemes. The RCMI institutions and their CECs serve as models to circumvent the historical and current challenges to research in communities disproportionately affected by health disparities. Lessons learned from these cores may help other institutions who want to build community trust in and capacities for research that addresses community-related health concerns. |
Williamson, Heather J; Perkins, Elizabeth A; Levin, Bruce L; Baldwin, Julie A; Lulinski, Amie; Armstrong, Mary I; Massey, Oliver T Implementation of Medicaid managed long-term services and supports for adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities in Kansas Journal Article Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55 (2), pp. 84-96, 2017. @article{Williamson2017b, title = {Implementation of Medicaid managed long-term services and supports for adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities in Kansas}, author = {Heather J Williamson and Elizabeth A Perkins and Bruce L Levin and Julie A Baldwin and Amie Lulinski and Mary I Armstrong and Oliver T Massey}, url = {http://www.aaiddjournals.org/doi/10.1352/1934-9556-55.2.84}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-04-01}, journal = {Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities}, volume = {55}, number = {2}, pages = {84-96}, abstract = {Many adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) can access health and long-term services and supports (LTSS) through Medicaid. States are reforming their Medicaid LTSS programs from a fee-for-service model to a Medicaid managed LTSS (MLTSS) approach, anticipating improved quality of care and reduced costs, although there is limited evidence of MLTSS effectiveness. This study's objective was to contribute to the growing MLTSS research literature by describing MLTSS implementation in Kansas for adults with IDD. Thirty-one stakeholders completed in-depth semi-structured interviews, representing state or regional groups, service coordination providers, and family caregivers. Findings identify key aspects of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' new MLTSS regulations in the design and implementation of MLTSS programs.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Many adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) can access health and long-term services and supports (LTSS) through Medicaid. States are reforming their Medicaid LTSS programs from a fee-for-service model to a Medicaid managed LTSS (MLTSS) approach, anticipating improved quality of care and reduced costs, although there is limited evidence of MLTSS effectiveness. This study's objective was to contribute to the growing MLTSS research literature by describing MLTSS implementation in Kansas for adults with IDD. Thirty-one stakeholders completed in-depth semi-structured interviews, representing state or regional groups, service coordination providers, and family caregivers. Findings identify key aspects of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' new MLTSS regulations in the design and implementation of MLTSS programs. |
2021 |
Akintobi, Tabia Henry; Sheikhattari, Payam; Shaffer, Emma; Evans, Christina L; Braun, Kathryn L; Sy, Angela U; Mancera, Bibiana; Campa, Adriana; Miller, Stephania T; Sarpong, Daniel; Holliday, Rhonda; Jimenez-Chavez, Julio; Khan, Shafiq; Hinton, Cimona; Sellars-Bates, Kimberly; Ajewole, Veronica; Teufel-Shone, Nicolette I International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 18 (12), 2021. @article{Akintobi2021, title = {Community Engagement Practices at Research Centers in U.S. Minority Institutions: Priority Populations and Innovative Approaches to Advancing Health Disparities Research}, author = {Tabia Henry Akintobi and Payam Sheikhattari and Emma Shaffer and Christina L. Evans and Kathryn L. Braun and Angela U. Sy and Bibiana Mancera and Adriana Campa and Stephania T. Miller and Daniel Sarpong and Rhonda Holliday and Julio Jimenez-Chavez and Shafiq Khan and Cimona Hinton and Kimberly Sellars-Bates and Veronica Ajewole and Nicolette I. Teufel-Shone}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126675}, doi = {10.3390/ijerph18126675}, year = {2021}, date = {2021-06-21}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health }, volume = {18}, number = {12}, abstract = {This paper details U.S. Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Community Engagement Cores (CECs): (1) unique and cross-cutting components, focus areas, specific aims, and target populations; and (2) approaches utilized to build or sustain trust towards community participation in research. A mixed-method data collection approach was employed for this cross-sectional study of current or previously funded RCMIs. A total of 18 of the 25 institutions spanning 13 U.S. states and territories participated. CEC specific aims were to support community engaged research (94%); to translate and disseminate research findings (88%); to develop partnerships (82%); and to build capacity around community research (71%). Four open-ended questions, qualitative analysis, and comparison of the categories led to the emergence of two supporting themes: (1) establishing trust between the community-academic collaborators and within the community and (2) building collaborative relationships. An overarching theme, building community together through trust and meaningful collaborations, emerged from the supporting themes and subthemes. The RCMI institutions and their CECs serve as models to circumvent the historical and current challenges to research in communities disproportionately affected by health disparities. Lessons learned from these cores may help other institutions who want to build community trust in and capacities for research that addresses community-related health concerns.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } This paper details U.S. Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Community Engagement Cores (CECs): (1) unique and cross-cutting components, focus areas, specific aims, and target populations; and (2) approaches utilized to build or sustain trust towards community participation in research. A mixed-method data collection approach was employed for this cross-sectional study of current or previously funded RCMIs. A total of 18 of the 25 institutions spanning 13 U.S. states and territories participated. CEC specific aims were to support community engaged research (94%); to translate and disseminate research findings (88%); to develop partnerships (82%); and to build capacity around community research (71%). Four open-ended questions, qualitative analysis, and comparison of the categories led to the emergence of two supporting themes: (1) establishing trust between the community-academic collaborators and within the community and (2) building collaborative relationships. An overarching theme, building community together through trust and meaningful collaborations, emerged from the supporting themes and subthemes. The RCMI institutions and their CECs serve as models to circumvent the historical and current challenges to research in communities disproportionately affected by health disparities. Lessons learned from these cores may help other institutions who want to build community trust in and capacities for research that addresses community-related health concerns. |
2017 |
Williamson, Heather J; Perkins, Elizabeth A; Levin, Bruce L; Baldwin, Julie A; Lulinski, Amie; Armstrong, Mary I; Massey, Oliver T Implementation of Medicaid managed long-term services and supports for adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities in Kansas Journal Article Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55 (2), pp. 84-96, 2017. @article{Williamson2017b, title = {Implementation of Medicaid managed long-term services and supports for adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities in Kansas}, author = {Heather J Williamson and Elizabeth A Perkins and Bruce L Levin and Julie A Baldwin and Amie Lulinski and Mary I Armstrong and Oliver T Massey}, url = {http://www.aaiddjournals.org/doi/10.1352/1934-9556-55.2.84}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-04-01}, journal = {Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities}, volume = {55}, number = {2}, pages = {84-96}, abstract = {Many adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) can access health and long-term services and supports (LTSS) through Medicaid. States are reforming their Medicaid LTSS programs from a fee-for-service model to a Medicaid managed LTSS (MLTSS) approach, anticipating improved quality of care and reduced costs, although there is limited evidence of MLTSS effectiveness. This study's objective was to contribute to the growing MLTSS research literature by describing MLTSS implementation in Kansas for adults with IDD. Thirty-one stakeholders completed in-depth semi-structured interviews, representing state or regional groups, service coordination providers, and family caregivers. Findings identify key aspects of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' new MLTSS regulations in the design and implementation of MLTSS programs.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Many adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) can access health and long-term services and supports (LTSS) through Medicaid. States are reforming their Medicaid LTSS programs from a fee-for-service model to a Medicaid managed LTSS (MLTSS) approach, anticipating improved quality of care and reduced costs, although there is limited evidence of MLTSS effectiveness. This study's objective was to contribute to the growing MLTSS research literature by describing MLTSS implementation in Kansas for adults with IDD. Thirty-one stakeholders completed in-depth semi-structured interviews, representing state or regional groups, service coordination providers, and family caregivers. Findings identify key aspects of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' new MLTSS regulations in the design and implementation of MLTSS programs. |