NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Bea, Jennifer W; Charley, Brenda; Lane, Taylor; Kinslow, Brian; de Heer, Hendrik 'Dirk'; Yazzie, Etta; Yellowhair, Janet; Hudson, Jennifer; Wertheim, Betsy C; Schwartz, Anna L Sage Journals, 2022. @article{Bea2022, title = {Formative Evaluation and Adaptation of a Navajo Cancer Survivor Physical Activity Intervention to Serve a Broader Native American Cancer Survivor Community}, author = {Jennifer W Bea and Brenda Charley and Taylor Lane and Brian Kinslow and Hendrik 'Dirk' de Heer and Etta Yazzie and Janet Yellowhair and Jennifer Hudson and Betsy C Wertheim and Anna L Schwartz}, doi = {10.1177/15248399221131318}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-11-26}, journal = {Sage Journals}, abstract = {Background Although exercise has been shown to improve cancer survivorship in other communities, cancer exercise studies among Native American communities are rare. We sought to adapt a Navajo-tailored cancer exercise pilot program to serve a broader Native American cancer community. Methods Tribal experts representing 10 different Tribal Nations were engaged in small focus groups (n=2–4) to assess program materials for cultural appropriateness and adaptation to expand tribal inclusiveness. Facilitated by a trained Native American interviewer, focus groups were provided a primer survey and then reviewed intervention materials (protocols, incentives, logo, flyers, etc.). Consensus was reached by the research team on all program adaptations. Results The program name, Restoring Balance, layout, graphics, and symbols were considered culturally appropriate overall. Program exercises and biomarker measurements were viewed as valuable to health improvements in the community. Important color, linguistic, and logistic program modifications were recommended to improve cultural alignment. The order of incentive items was revised to highlight restoration and the logo rotated to align with the four corners of the earth, an important cultural element. Linguistic modifications primarily related to prior traumatic research experiences in Native American communities where data had been taken without adequate community benefit or permission. Program emphasis should be on nurturing, added value and giving. Conclusion and Relevance The methodology used for cultural expert review was successful in eliciting adaptations to expand the tribal inclusiveness of Restoring Balance. Culture, as well as historically traumatic research experiences, among Native American populations must be considered when adapting health promotion programming.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Background Although exercise has been shown to improve cancer survivorship in other communities, cancer exercise studies among Native American communities are rare. We sought to adapt a Navajo-tailored cancer exercise pilot program to serve a broader Native American cancer community. Methods Tribal experts representing 10 different Tribal Nations were engaged in small focus groups (n=2–4) to assess program materials for cultural appropriateness and adaptation to expand tribal inclusiveness. Facilitated by a trained Native American interviewer, focus groups were provided a primer survey and then reviewed intervention materials (protocols, incentives, logo, flyers, etc.). Consensus was reached by the research team on all program adaptations. Results The program name, Restoring Balance, layout, graphics, and symbols were considered culturally appropriate overall. Program exercises and biomarker measurements were viewed as valuable to health improvements in the community. Important color, linguistic, and logistic program modifications were recommended to improve cultural alignment. The order of incentive items was revised to highlight restoration and the logo rotated to align with the four corners of the earth, an important cultural element. Linguistic modifications primarily related to prior traumatic research experiences in Native American communities where data had been taken without adequate community benefit or permission. Program emphasis should be on nurturing, added value and giving. Conclusion and Relevance The methodology used for cultural expert review was successful in eliciting adaptations to expand the tribal inclusiveness of Restoring Balance. Culture, as well as historically traumatic research experiences, among Native American populations must be considered when adapting health promotion programming. |
Tsosie, Shepherd; Petillo, Michael Searching for Our Two-Spirit Relations in Evaluation by Shepherd Tsosie and Michael Petillo Journal Article AEA365, 2022. @article{Tsosie2022, title = {Searching for Our Two-Spirit Relations in Evaluation by Shepherd Tsosie and Michael Petillo}, author = {Shepherd Tsosie and Michael Petillo}, url = {https://aea365.org/blog/ipe-tig-week-searching-for-our-two-spirit-relations-in-evaluation-by-shepherd-tsosie-and-michael-petillo/}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-11-15}, journal = {AEA365}, abstract = {Hi, we’re Shepherd Tsosie (they/them) (Diné), an Independent Researcher living and working on the traditional territories of the Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation; and Michael Petillo (he/him or they/them), Principal Consultant for CES Partnership and Senior Research Coordinator at the Center for Health Equity Research of Northern Arizona University, which includes or touches on Ndee/Nnēē, Diné, Havasupai, Hohokam/O’odham, Hopitutskwa, Hualapai, Pueblos, and Shiwinna territories and sacred homelands. We’re honored to be part of the IPE TIG’s blog week.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Hi, we’re Shepherd Tsosie (they/them) (Diné), an Independent Researcher living and working on the traditional territories of the Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation; and Michael Petillo (he/him or they/them), Principal Consultant for CES Partnership and Senior Research Coordinator at the Center for Health Equity Research of Northern Arizona University, which includes or touches on Ndee/Nnēē, Diné, Havasupai, Hohokam/O’odham, Hopitutskwa, Hualapai, Pueblos, and Shiwinna territories and sacred homelands. We’re honored to be part of the IPE TIG’s blog week. |
Cragun, Deborah; Pal, Tuya; Vadaparampil, Susan T; Baldwin, Julie A; Hampel, Heather; DeBate, Rita D Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness Journal Article Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10 (3), pp. 251-272, 2016, ISBN: 1558-6898. @article{Cragun2016, title = {Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness}, author = {Deborah Cragun and Tuya Pal and Susan T Vadaparampil and Julie A Baldwin and Heather Hampel and Rita D DeBate}, url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1558689815572023}, isbn = {1558-6898}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-01}, journal = {Journal of Mixed Methods Research}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {251-272}, abstract = {Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was developed over 25 years ago to bridge the qualitative and quantitative research gap. On searching PubMed and the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, this review identified 30 original research studies that used QCA. Perceptions that QCA is complex and provides few relative advantages over other methods may be limiting QCA adoption. Thus, to overcome these perceptions, this article demonstrates how to perform QCA using data from 15 institutions that implemented universal tumor screening programs to identify patients at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. In this example, QCA revealed a combination of conditions unique to effective universal tumor screening programs. Results informed additional research and provided a model for improving patient follow-through after a positive screen.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was developed over 25 years ago to bridge the qualitative and quantitative research gap. On searching PubMed and the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, this review identified 30 original research studies that used QCA. Perceptions that QCA is complex and provides few relative advantages over other methods may be limiting QCA adoption. Thus, to overcome these perceptions, this article demonstrates how to perform QCA using data from 15 institutions that implemented universal tumor screening programs to identify patients at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. In this example, QCA revealed a combination of conditions unique to effective universal tumor screening programs. Results informed additional research and provided a model for improving patient follow-through after a positive screen. |
Williamson, Heather J; Young, Belinda-Rose; Murray, Nichole; Burton, Donna L; Levin, Bruce Lubotsky; Massey, Oliver Tom; Baldwin, Julie A Community-university partnerships for research and practice: Application of an interactive and contextual model of collaboration Journal Article Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20 (2), pp. 55-84, 2016, ISSN: 1534-6104. @article{Williamson2016b, title = {Community-university partnerships for research and practice: Application of an interactive and contextual model of collaboration}, author = {Heather J Williamson and Belinda-Rose Young and Nichole Murray and Donna L Burton and Bruce Lubotsky Levin and Oliver Tom Massey and Julie A Baldwin}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295659/}, issn = {1534-6104}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, journal = {Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement}, volume = {20}, number = {2}, pages = {55-84}, abstract = {Community–university partnerships are frequently used to enhance translational research efforts while benefiting the community. However, challenges remain in evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the utility of applying the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration to a translational research education program, the Institute for Translational Research in adolescent Behavioral Health, to guide programmatic efforts and future evaluations. Institute stakeholders from academia and the community completed in-depth interviews querying their expectations and experiences in this collaboration. Key quotes and themes were extracted and analyzed based on the constructs within the 3 phases of the model. The findings note specific themes for future valuations. Overall, the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration proved a useful framework to guide the process evaluation of the Institute. Findings suggest possible strategies for the successful development, evaluation, and sustainability of community–university partnerships.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Community–university partnerships are frequently used to enhance translational research efforts while benefiting the community. However, challenges remain in evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the utility of applying the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration to a translational research education program, the Institute for Translational Research in adolescent Behavioral Health, to guide programmatic efforts and future evaluations. Institute stakeholders from academia and the community completed in-depth interviews querying their expectations and experiences in this collaboration. Key quotes and themes were extracted and analyzed based on the constructs within the 3 phases of the model. The findings note specific themes for future valuations. Overall, the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration proved a useful framework to guide the process evaluation of the Institute. Findings suggest possible strategies for the successful development, evaluation, and sustainability of community–university partnerships. |
2022 |
Bea, Jennifer W; Charley, Brenda; Lane, Taylor; Kinslow, Brian; de Heer, Hendrik 'Dirk'; Yazzie, Etta; Yellowhair, Janet; Hudson, Jennifer; Wertheim, Betsy C; Schwartz, Anna L Sage Journals, 2022. @article{Bea2022, title = {Formative Evaluation and Adaptation of a Navajo Cancer Survivor Physical Activity Intervention to Serve a Broader Native American Cancer Survivor Community}, author = {Jennifer W Bea and Brenda Charley and Taylor Lane and Brian Kinslow and Hendrik 'Dirk' de Heer and Etta Yazzie and Janet Yellowhair and Jennifer Hudson and Betsy C Wertheim and Anna L Schwartz}, doi = {10.1177/15248399221131318}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-11-26}, journal = {Sage Journals}, abstract = {Background Although exercise has been shown to improve cancer survivorship in other communities, cancer exercise studies among Native American communities are rare. We sought to adapt a Navajo-tailored cancer exercise pilot program to serve a broader Native American cancer community. Methods Tribal experts representing 10 different Tribal Nations were engaged in small focus groups (n=2–4) to assess program materials for cultural appropriateness and adaptation to expand tribal inclusiveness. Facilitated by a trained Native American interviewer, focus groups were provided a primer survey and then reviewed intervention materials (protocols, incentives, logo, flyers, etc.). Consensus was reached by the research team on all program adaptations. Results The program name, Restoring Balance, layout, graphics, and symbols were considered culturally appropriate overall. Program exercises and biomarker measurements were viewed as valuable to health improvements in the community. Important color, linguistic, and logistic program modifications were recommended to improve cultural alignment. The order of incentive items was revised to highlight restoration and the logo rotated to align with the four corners of the earth, an important cultural element. Linguistic modifications primarily related to prior traumatic research experiences in Native American communities where data had been taken without adequate community benefit or permission. Program emphasis should be on nurturing, added value and giving. Conclusion and Relevance The methodology used for cultural expert review was successful in eliciting adaptations to expand the tribal inclusiveness of Restoring Balance. Culture, as well as historically traumatic research experiences, among Native American populations must be considered when adapting health promotion programming.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Background Although exercise has been shown to improve cancer survivorship in other communities, cancer exercise studies among Native American communities are rare. We sought to adapt a Navajo-tailored cancer exercise pilot program to serve a broader Native American cancer community. Methods Tribal experts representing 10 different Tribal Nations were engaged in small focus groups (n=2–4) to assess program materials for cultural appropriateness and adaptation to expand tribal inclusiveness. Facilitated by a trained Native American interviewer, focus groups were provided a primer survey and then reviewed intervention materials (protocols, incentives, logo, flyers, etc.). Consensus was reached by the research team on all program adaptations. Results The program name, Restoring Balance, layout, graphics, and symbols were considered culturally appropriate overall. Program exercises and biomarker measurements were viewed as valuable to health improvements in the community. Important color, linguistic, and logistic program modifications were recommended to improve cultural alignment. The order of incentive items was revised to highlight restoration and the logo rotated to align with the four corners of the earth, an important cultural element. Linguistic modifications primarily related to prior traumatic research experiences in Native American communities where data had been taken without adequate community benefit or permission. Program emphasis should be on nurturing, added value and giving. Conclusion and Relevance The methodology used for cultural expert review was successful in eliciting adaptations to expand the tribal inclusiveness of Restoring Balance. Culture, as well as historically traumatic research experiences, among Native American populations must be considered when adapting health promotion programming. |
Tsosie, Shepherd; Petillo, Michael Searching for Our Two-Spirit Relations in Evaluation by Shepherd Tsosie and Michael Petillo Journal Article AEA365, 2022. @article{Tsosie2022, title = {Searching for Our Two-Spirit Relations in Evaluation by Shepherd Tsosie and Michael Petillo}, author = {Shepherd Tsosie and Michael Petillo}, url = {https://aea365.org/blog/ipe-tig-week-searching-for-our-two-spirit-relations-in-evaluation-by-shepherd-tsosie-and-michael-petillo/}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-11-15}, journal = {AEA365}, abstract = {Hi, we’re Shepherd Tsosie (they/them) (Diné), an Independent Researcher living and working on the traditional territories of the Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation; and Michael Petillo (he/him or they/them), Principal Consultant for CES Partnership and Senior Research Coordinator at the Center for Health Equity Research of Northern Arizona University, which includes or touches on Ndee/Nnēē, Diné, Havasupai, Hohokam/O’odham, Hopitutskwa, Hualapai, Pueblos, and Shiwinna territories and sacred homelands. We’re honored to be part of the IPE TIG’s blog week.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Hi, we’re Shepherd Tsosie (they/them) (Diné), an Independent Researcher living and working on the traditional territories of the Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation; and Michael Petillo (he/him or they/them), Principal Consultant for CES Partnership and Senior Research Coordinator at the Center for Health Equity Research of Northern Arizona University, which includes or touches on Ndee/Nnēē, Diné, Havasupai, Hohokam/O’odham, Hopitutskwa, Hualapai, Pueblos, and Shiwinna territories and sacred homelands. We’re honored to be part of the IPE TIG’s blog week. |
2016 |
Cragun, Deborah; Pal, Tuya; Vadaparampil, Susan T; Baldwin, Julie A; Hampel, Heather; DeBate, Rita D Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness Journal Article Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10 (3), pp. 251-272, 2016, ISBN: 1558-6898. @article{Cragun2016, title = {Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness}, author = {Deborah Cragun and Tuya Pal and Susan T Vadaparampil and Julie A Baldwin and Heather Hampel and Rita D DeBate}, url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1558689815572023}, isbn = {1558-6898}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-07-01}, journal = {Journal of Mixed Methods Research}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {251-272}, abstract = {Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was developed over 25 years ago to bridge the qualitative and quantitative research gap. On searching PubMed and the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, this review identified 30 original research studies that used QCA. Perceptions that QCA is complex and provides few relative advantages over other methods may be limiting QCA adoption. Thus, to overcome these perceptions, this article demonstrates how to perform QCA using data from 15 institutions that implemented universal tumor screening programs to identify patients at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. In this example, QCA revealed a combination of conditions unique to effective universal tumor screening programs. Results informed additional research and provided a model for improving patient follow-through after a positive screen.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was developed over 25 years ago to bridge the qualitative and quantitative research gap. On searching PubMed and the Journal of Mixed Methods Research, this review identified 30 original research studies that used QCA. Perceptions that QCA is complex and provides few relative advantages over other methods may be limiting QCA adoption. Thus, to overcome these perceptions, this article demonstrates how to perform QCA using data from 15 institutions that implemented universal tumor screening programs to identify patients at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. In this example, QCA revealed a combination of conditions unique to effective universal tumor screening programs. Results informed additional research and provided a model for improving patient follow-through after a positive screen. |
Williamson, Heather J; Young, Belinda-Rose; Murray, Nichole; Burton, Donna L; Levin, Bruce Lubotsky; Massey, Oliver Tom; Baldwin, Julie A Community-university partnerships for research and practice: Application of an interactive and contextual model of collaboration Journal Article Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20 (2), pp. 55-84, 2016, ISSN: 1534-6104. @article{Williamson2016b, title = {Community-university partnerships for research and practice: Application of an interactive and contextual model of collaboration}, author = {Heather J Williamson and Belinda-Rose Young and Nichole Murray and Donna L Burton and Bruce Lubotsky Levin and Oliver Tom Massey and Julie A Baldwin}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5295659/}, issn = {1534-6104}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-01}, journal = {Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement}, volume = {20}, number = {2}, pages = {55-84}, abstract = {Community–university partnerships are frequently used to enhance translational research efforts while benefiting the community. However, challenges remain in evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the utility of applying the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration to a translational research education program, the Institute for Translational Research in adolescent Behavioral Health, to guide programmatic efforts and future evaluations. Institute stakeholders from academia and the community completed in-depth interviews querying their expectations and experiences in this collaboration. Key quotes and themes were extracted and analyzed based on the constructs within the 3 phases of the model. The findings note specific themes for future valuations. Overall, the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration proved a useful framework to guide the process evaluation of the Institute. Findings suggest possible strategies for the successful development, evaluation, and sustainability of community–university partnerships.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Community–university partnerships are frequently used to enhance translational research efforts while benefiting the community. However, challenges remain in evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the utility of applying the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration to a translational research education program, the Institute for Translational Research in adolescent Behavioral Health, to guide programmatic efforts and future evaluations. Institute stakeholders from academia and the community completed in-depth interviews querying their expectations and experiences in this collaboration. Key quotes and themes were extracted and analyzed based on the constructs within the 3 phases of the model. The findings note specific themes for future valuations. Overall, the contextual and interactive model of community–university collaboration proved a useful framework to guide the process evaluation of the Institute. Findings suggest possible strategies for the successful development, evaluation, and sustainability of community–university partnerships. |