NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Ortega, María Isabel; Sabo, Samantha; Gallegos, Patricia Aranda; Zapien, Jill Eileen Guernsey De; Zapien, Antonio; Abril, Gloria Elena Portillo; Rosales, Cecilia Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers Journal Article Frontiers in Public Health, 4 (54), pp. 1-10, 2016. @article{Ortega2016, title = {Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers}, author = {María Isabel Ortega and Samantha Sabo and Patricia Aranda Gallegos and Jill Eileen Guernsey De Zapien and Antonio Zapien and Gloria Elena Portillo Abril and Cecilia Rosales}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066471}, doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2016.00054}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-29}, journal = {Frontiers in Public Health}, volume = {4}, number = {54}, pages = {1-10}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs. |
Sabo, Samantha; Shaw, Susan; Ingram, Maia; Teufel-Shone, Nicolette; Carvajal, Scott; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey; Rosales, Cecilia; Redondo, Flor; Garcia, Gina; Rubio-Goldsmith, Raquel Everyday violence, structural racism and mistreatment at the US-Mexico border Journal Article Social Science and Medicine, 109 , pp. 66-74, 2014. @article{Sabo2014, title = {Everyday violence, structural racism and mistreatment at the US-Mexico border}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Susan Shaw and Maia Ingram and Nicolette Teufel-Shone and Scott Carvajal and Jill Guernsey de Zapien and Cecilia Rosales and Flor Redondo and Gina Garcia and Raquel Rubio-Goldsmith}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24705336}, doi = {10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.005}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-05-01}, journal = {Social Science and Medicine}, volume = {109}, pages = {66-74}, abstract = {Immigration laws that militarize communities may exacerbate ethno-racial health disparities. We aimed to document the prevalence of and ways in which immigration enforcement policy and militarization of the US-Mexico border is experienced as everyday violence. Militarization is defined as the saturation of and pervasive encounters with immigration officials including local police enacting immigration and border enforcement policy with military style tactics and weapons. Data were drawn from a random household sample of US citizen and permanent residents of Mexican descent in the Arizona border region (2006-2008). Qualitative and quantitative data documented the frequency and nature of immigration related profiling, mistreatment and resistance to institutionalized victimization. Participants described living and working in a highly militarized environment, wherein immigration-related profiling and mistreatment were common immigration law enforcement practices. Approximately 25% of respondents described an immigration-related mistreatment episode, of which 62% were personally victimized. Nearly 75% of episodes occurred in a community location rather than at a US port of entry. Participant mistreatment narratives suggest the normalization of immigration-related mistreatment among the population. Given border security remains at the core of immigration reform debates, it is imperative that scholars advance the understanding of the public health impact of such enforcement policies on the daily lives of Mexican-origin US permanent residents, and their non-immigrant US citizen co-ethnics. Immigration policy that sanctions institutional practices of discrimination, such as ethno-racial profiling and mistreatment, are forms of structural racism and everyday violence. Metrics and systems for monitoring immigration and border enforcement policies and institutional practices deleterious to the health of US citizens and residents should be established.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Immigration laws that militarize communities may exacerbate ethno-racial health disparities. We aimed to document the prevalence of and ways in which immigration enforcement policy and militarization of the US-Mexico border is experienced as everyday violence. Militarization is defined as the saturation of and pervasive encounters with immigration officials including local police enacting immigration and border enforcement policy with military style tactics and weapons. Data were drawn from a random household sample of US citizen and permanent residents of Mexican descent in the Arizona border region (2006-2008). Qualitative and quantitative data documented the frequency and nature of immigration related profiling, mistreatment and resistance to institutionalized victimization. Participants described living and working in a highly militarized environment, wherein immigration-related profiling and mistreatment were common immigration law enforcement practices. Approximately 25% of respondents described an immigration-related mistreatment episode, of which 62% were personally victimized. Nearly 75% of episodes occurred in a community location rather than at a US port of entry. Participant mistreatment narratives suggest the normalization of immigration-related mistreatment among the population. Given border security remains at the core of immigration reform debates, it is imperative that scholars advance the understanding of the public health impact of such enforcement policies on the daily lives of Mexican-origin US permanent residents, and their non-immigrant US citizen co-ethnics. Immigration policy that sanctions institutional practices of discrimination, such as ethno-racial profiling and mistreatment, are forms of structural racism and everyday violence. Metrics and systems for monitoring immigration and border enforcement policies and institutional practices deleterious to the health of US citizens and residents should be established. |
Gallegos, Patricia A; Velez, Maria Ortega I; Rosales, Cecilia; de Zapien, Jill; Sabo, Samantha; Zapien, Antonio Migracion y atención a la salud de los Jornalero agricolas Book Chapter In Alternativas en la crisis para la transformación de las políticas sociales en México,, Chapter 7, El Colegio de Sonora, CIAD, Fundación Konrad Adenauer, 2013, ISBN: 978-607-7900-11-5. @inbook{Gallegos2013, title = {Migracion y atención a la salud de los Jornalero agricolas}, author = {Patricia A Gallegos and Maria Ortega I Velez and Cecilia Rosales and Jill de Zapien and Samantha Sabo and Antonio Zapien}, url = {http://alamo.colson.edu.mx:8085/sitios/CESS/091020_frutosTrabajo/frutos_archivos/ArandaOrtega2013_Migracion%20y%20atencion.pdf}, isbn = {978-607-7900-11-5}, year = {2013}, date = {2013-01-01}, booktitle = {In Alternativas en la crisis para la transformación de las políticas sociales en México,}, publisher = {El Colegio de Sonora, CIAD, Fundación Konrad Adenauer}, chapter = {7}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |
2016 |
Ortega, María Isabel; Sabo, Samantha; Gallegos, Patricia Aranda; Zapien, Jill Eileen Guernsey De; Zapien, Antonio; Abril, Gloria Elena Portillo; Rosales, Cecilia Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers Journal Article Frontiers in Public Health, 4 (54), pp. 1-10, 2016. @article{Ortega2016, title = {Agribusiness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Health of Agricultural Migrant Workers}, author = {María Isabel Ortega and Samantha Sabo and Patricia Aranda Gallegos and Jill Eileen Guernsey De Zapien and Antonio Zapien and Gloria Elena Portillo Abril and Cecilia Rosales}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27066471}, doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2016.00054}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-03-29}, journal = {Frontiers in Public Health}, volume = {4}, number = {54}, pages = {1-10}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } BACKGROUND: Living conditions and health of migrant farmworkers could benefit from a health promotion model based on corporate social responsibility (CSR). OBJECTIVE: To understand how Mexican agribusiness owners and general managers view and practice CSR. METHODS: We interviewed 8 agribusiness owners/managers and 233 farmworkers using open-ended interviews and gathered anthropometrical data of 133 children from farmworkers families. To guide our analysis and discussion, we followed the two-dimension model of CSR proposed by Quazi and O'Brien. RESULTS: According to interviewee responses, mean percentage of agreement with CSR concept was 77.4%, with a range of 54-85.7%. Main health-related issues among farmworkers were infectious diseases, crowding, and access to health-care services; there were acute cases of undernutrition among farmworkers' children and diets were of poor quality. DISCUSSION: Agribusiness owners and managers understand and practice CSR according to a wide and modern view, which contradicts with farmworkers' living conditions and health. Quazi and O'Brien model should consider the social context, in which it is analyzed, and the social manifestations of community development as a tool for further analysis on the perceptions and actions of entrepreneurs. |
2014 |
Sabo, Samantha; Shaw, Susan; Ingram, Maia; Teufel-Shone, Nicolette; Carvajal, Scott; de Zapien, Jill Guernsey; Rosales, Cecilia; Redondo, Flor; Garcia, Gina; Rubio-Goldsmith, Raquel Everyday violence, structural racism and mistreatment at the US-Mexico border Journal Article Social Science and Medicine, 109 , pp. 66-74, 2014. @article{Sabo2014, title = {Everyday violence, structural racism and mistreatment at the US-Mexico border}, author = {Samantha Sabo and Susan Shaw and Maia Ingram and Nicolette Teufel-Shone and Scott Carvajal and Jill Guernsey de Zapien and Cecilia Rosales and Flor Redondo and Gina Garcia and Raquel Rubio-Goldsmith}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24705336}, doi = {10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.005}, year = {2014}, date = {2014-05-01}, journal = {Social Science and Medicine}, volume = {109}, pages = {66-74}, abstract = {Immigration laws that militarize communities may exacerbate ethno-racial health disparities. We aimed to document the prevalence of and ways in which immigration enforcement policy and militarization of the US-Mexico border is experienced as everyday violence. Militarization is defined as the saturation of and pervasive encounters with immigration officials including local police enacting immigration and border enforcement policy with military style tactics and weapons. Data were drawn from a random household sample of US citizen and permanent residents of Mexican descent in the Arizona border region (2006-2008). Qualitative and quantitative data documented the frequency and nature of immigration related profiling, mistreatment and resistance to institutionalized victimization. Participants described living and working in a highly militarized environment, wherein immigration-related profiling and mistreatment were common immigration law enforcement practices. Approximately 25% of respondents described an immigration-related mistreatment episode, of which 62% were personally victimized. Nearly 75% of episodes occurred in a community location rather than at a US port of entry. Participant mistreatment narratives suggest the normalization of immigration-related mistreatment among the population. Given border security remains at the core of immigration reform debates, it is imperative that scholars advance the understanding of the public health impact of such enforcement policies on the daily lives of Mexican-origin US permanent residents, and their non-immigrant US citizen co-ethnics. Immigration policy that sanctions institutional practices of discrimination, such as ethno-racial profiling and mistreatment, are forms of structural racism and everyday violence. Metrics and systems for monitoring immigration and border enforcement policies and institutional practices deleterious to the health of US citizens and residents should be established.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Immigration laws that militarize communities may exacerbate ethno-racial health disparities. We aimed to document the prevalence of and ways in which immigration enforcement policy and militarization of the US-Mexico border is experienced as everyday violence. Militarization is defined as the saturation of and pervasive encounters with immigration officials including local police enacting immigration and border enforcement policy with military style tactics and weapons. Data were drawn from a random household sample of US citizen and permanent residents of Mexican descent in the Arizona border region (2006-2008). Qualitative and quantitative data documented the frequency and nature of immigration related profiling, mistreatment and resistance to institutionalized victimization. Participants described living and working in a highly militarized environment, wherein immigration-related profiling and mistreatment were common immigration law enforcement practices. Approximately 25% of respondents described an immigration-related mistreatment episode, of which 62% were personally victimized. Nearly 75% of episodes occurred in a community location rather than at a US port of entry. Participant mistreatment narratives suggest the normalization of immigration-related mistreatment among the population. Given border security remains at the core of immigration reform debates, it is imperative that scholars advance the understanding of the public health impact of such enforcement policies on the daily lives of Mexican-origin US permanent residents, and their non-immigrant US citizen co-ethnics. Immigration policy that sanctions institutional practices of discrimination, such as ethno-racial profiling and mistreatment, are forms of structural racism and everyday violence. Metrics and systems for monitoring immigration and border enforcement policies and institutional practices deleterious to the health of US citizens and residents should be established. |
2013 |
Gallegos, Patricia A; Velez, Maria Ortega I; Rosales, Cecilia; de Zapien, Jill; Sabo, Samantha; Zapien, Antonio Migracion y atención a la salud de los Jornalero agricolas Book Chapter In Alternativas en la crisis para la transformación de las políticas sociales en México,, Chapter 7, El Colegio de Sonora, CIAD, Fundación Konrad Adenauer, 2013, ISBN: 978-607-7900-11-5. @inbook{Gallegos2013, title = {Migracion y atención a la salud de los Jornalero agricolas}, author = {Patricia A Gallegos and Maria Ortega I Velez and Cecilia Rosales and Jill de Zapien and Samantha Sabo and Antonio Zapien}, url = {http://alamo.colson.edu.mx:8085/sitios/CESS/091020_frutosTrabajo/frutos_archivos/ArandaOrtega2013_Migracion%20y%20atencion.pdf}, isbn = {978-607-7900-11-5}, year = {2013}, date = {2013-01-01}, booktitle = {In Alternativas en la crisis para la transformación de las políticas sociales en México,}, publisher = {El Colegio de Sonora, CIAD, Fundación Konrad Adenauer}, chapter = {7}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {inbook} } |