NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Boucher, Nathan; Bull, Janet; Cross, S H; Kirby, Christine; David, Kelly J; Taylor, D H Acceptability of Innovative Palliative Care Model: Healthcare Consumer and Federal Taxpayer Views Journal Article Innovation in Aging, 2 (S1), pp. 1, 2018. @article{Boucher2018d, title = {Acceptability of Innovative Palliative Care Model: Healthcare Consumer and Federal Taxpayer Views}, author = {Nathan Boucher and Janet Bull and S H Cross and Christine Kirby and J Kelly David and D H Taylor}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230062/}, doi = {10.1093/geroni/igy023.767}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-11-11}, journal = {Innovation in Aging}, volume = {2}, number = {S1}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Semi-structured interviews with palliative care users were conducted along with federal taxpayers focus groups to assess palliative care knowledge. Interviewers also queried acceptability of a new model of community-based palliative care. Gaps in interview participants’ knowledge related to knowing services available in palliative care, how palliative care is paid for, and how to initiate palliative care. Similar concerns were shared by focus groups with the addition of their noting improved knowledge of palliative care from the focus group itself. Interview participants’ feedback on the new model of care included not having palliative care explained adequately and palliative care providers seen as consultants rather than providing full-time attention to care. Focus groups indicated the model sounded promising, but likely difficult to enact in our current system. Additional feedback from interviews/focus groups included perceptions that clinicians spent more time and provided more support for patients/families, and the broader application of palliative care.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Semi-structured interviews with palliative care users were conducted along with federal taxpayers focus groups to assess palliative care knowledge. Interviewers also queried acceptability of a new model of community-based palliative care. Gaps in interview participants’ knowledge related to knowing services available in palliative care, how palliative care is paid for, and how to initiate palliative care. Similar concerns were shared by focus groups with the addition of their noting improved knowledge of palliative care from the focus group itself. Interview participants’ feedback on the new model of care included not having palliative care explained adequately and palliative care providers seen as consultants rather than providing full-time attention to care. Focus groups indicated the model sounded promising, but likely difficult to enact in our current system. Additional feedback from interviews/focus groups included perceptions that clinicians spent more time and provided more support for patients/families, and the broader application of palliative care. |
2018 |
Boucher, Nathan; Bull, Janet; Cross, S H; Kirby, Christine; David, Kelly J; Taylor, D H Acceptability of Innovative Palliative Care Model: Healthcare Consumer and Federal Taxpayer Views Journal Article Innovation in Aging, 2 (S1), pp. 1, 2018. @article{Boucher2018d, title = {Acceptability of Innovative Palliative Care Model: Healthcare Consumer and Federal Taxpayer Views}, author = {Nathan Boucher and Janet Bull and S H Cross and Christine Kirby and J Kelly David and D H Taylor}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6230062/}, doi = {10.1093/geroni/igy023.767}, year = {2018}, date = {2018-11-11}, journal = {Innovation in Aging}, volume = {2}, number = {S1}, pages = {1}, abstract = {Semi-structured interviews with palliative care users were conducted along with federal taxpayers focus groups to assess palliative care knowledge. Interviewers also queried acceptability of a new model of community-based palliative care. Gaps in interview participants’ knowledge related to knowing services available in palliative care, how palliative care is paid for, and how to initiate palliative care. Similar concerns were shared by focus groups with the addition of their noting improved knowledge of palliative care from the focus group itself. Interview participants’ feedback on the new model of care included not having palliative care explained adequately and palliative care providers seen as consultants rather than providing full-time attention to care. Focus groups indicated the model sounded promising, but likely difficult to enact in our current system. Additional feedback from interviews/focus groups included perceptions that clinicians spent more time and provided more support for patients/families, and the broader application of palliative care.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Semi-structured interviews with palliative care users were conducted along with federal taxpayers focus groups to assess palliative care knowledge. Interviewers also queried acceptability of a new model of community-based palliative care. Gaps in interview participants’ knowledge related to knowing services available in palliative care, how palliative care is paid for, and how to initiate palliative care. Similar concerns were shared by focus groups with the addition of their noting improved knowledge of palliative care from the focus group itself. Interview participants’ feedback on the new model of care included not having palliative care explained adequately and palliative care providers seen as consultants rather than providing full-time attention to care. Focus groups indicated the model sounded promising, but likely difficult to enact in our current system. Additional feedback from interviews/focus groups included perceptions that clinicians spent more time and provided more support for patients/families, and the broader application of palliative care. |