NAU publications by CHER
Faculty & staff publications
NAU faculty and staff have the opportunity to publish their findings and knowledge as authors. CHER has many researchers that have been cited multiple times in major publications for their great work. The Center for Health Equity Research has accumulated all faculty publications into one, easy to navigate database.
Please type in a key word or author LAST name to search
Mayer, Alyssa B; McDermott, Robert J; Bryant, Carol A; Baldwin, Julie A; Kromrey, Jeffrey Sustainability of community-based health promotion coalitions: Putting theory into practice Journal Article Health Behavior and Policy Review, 4 (6), pp. 511-520, 2017. @article{Mayer2017, title = {Sustainability of community-based health promotion coalitions: Putting theory into practice}, author = {Alyssa B Mayer and Robert J McDermott and Carol A Bryant and Julie A Baldwin and Jeffrey Kromrey}, url = {http://ingentaconnect.com/contentone/psp/hbpr/2017/00000004/00000006/art00001;jsessionid=22whnsckp4hwq.x-ic-live-03}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-11-01}, journal = {Health Behavior and Policy Review}, volume = {4}, number = {6}, pages = {511-520}, abstract = {Objective: Despite their rich potential, community coalitions enjoy mixed success in effecting long-term population health improvement. A need exists for strategies that augment and sustain their functional success. We undertook a study to enhance definition of the elements of coalition success and sustainability that, in turn, may foster better achievement in community-based participatory research (CBPR) and concomitant health-related outcomes. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews (N = 42) with academic researchers and their community coalition partners about the effectiveness of their collaborative endeavors. A grounded theory analysis of interview data informed the identification of domains and thematic elements influencing coalition effectiveness. Results: Seven domains emerged: (1) Characteristics related to coalition structure and processes; (2) Partner characteristics, eg, diversity, patience, flexibility, expertise; (3) Community characteristics, eg, capacity, ownership; (4) Partnership dynamics and synergy; (5) Tangible benefits; (6) Available resources, and; (7) Project characteristics. In all, 70 elements representing these domains influenced coalition effectiveness over time. Conclusions: These results extend our knowledge of factors contributing to coalition effectiveness and the sustainability of academic-community partnerships. Attention to these domains during key operational stages of CBPR initiatives is likely to have broad stakeholder benefits.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Objective: Despite their rich potential, community coalitions enjoy mixed success in effecting long-term population health improvement. A need exists for strategies that augment and sustain their functional success. We undertook a study to enhance definition of the elements of coalition success and sustainability that, in turn, may foster better achievement in community-based participatory research (CBPR) and concomitant health-related outcomes. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews (N = 42) with academic researchers and their community coalition partners about the effectiveness of their collaborative endeavors. A grounded theory analysis of interview data informed the identification of domains and thematic elements influencing coalition effectiveness. Results: Seven domains emerged: (1) Characteristics related to coalition structure and processes; (2) Partner characteristics, eg, diversity, patience, flexibility, expertise; (3) Community characteristics, eg, capacity, ownership; (4) Partnership dynamics and synergy; (5) Tangible benefits; (6) Available resources, and; (7) Project characteristics. In all, 70 elements representing these domains influenced coalition effectiveness over time. Conclusions: These results extend our knowledge of factors contributing to coalition effectiveness and the sustainability of academic-community partnerships. Attention to these domains during key operational stages of CBPR initiatives is likely to have broad stakeholder benefits. |
2017 |
Mayer, Alyssa B; McDermott, Robert J; Bryant, Carol A; Baldwin, Julie A; Kromrey, Jeffrey Sustainability of community-based health promotion coalitions: Putting theory into practice Journal Article Health Behavior and Policy Review, 4 (6), pp. 511-520, 2017. @article{Mayer2017, title = {Sustainability of community-based health promotion coalitions: Putting theory into practice}, author = {Alyssa B Mayer and Robert J McDermott and Carol A Bryant and Julie A Baldwin and Jeffrey Kromrey}, url = {http://ingentaconnect.com/contentone/psp/hbpr/2017/00000004/00000006/art00001;jsessionid=22whnsckp4hwq.x-ic-live-03}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-11-01}, journal = {Health Behavior and Policy Review}, volume = {4}, number = {6}, pages = {511-520}, abstract = {Objective: Despite their rich potential, community coalitions enjoy mixed success in effecting long-term population health improvement. A need exists for strategies that augment and sustain their functional success. We undertook a study to enhance definition of the elements of coalition success and sustainability that, in turn, may foster better achievement in community-based participatory research (CBPR) and concomitant health-related outcomes. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews (N = 42) with academic researchers and their community coalition partners about the effectiveness of their collaborative endeavors. A grounded theory analysis of interview data informed the identification of domains and thematic elements influencing coalition effectiveness. Results: Seven domains emerged: (1) Characteristics related to coalition structure and processes; (2) Partner characteristics, eg, diversity, patience, flexibility, expertise; (3) Community characteristics, eg, capacity, ownership; (4) Partnership dynamics and synergy; (5) Tangible benefits; (6) Available resources, and; (7) Project characteristics. In all, 70 elements representing these domains influenced coalition effectiveness over time. Conclusions: These results extend our knowledge of factors contributing to coalition effectiveness and the sustainability of academic-community partnerships. Attention to these domains during key operational stages of CBPR initiatives is likely to have broad stakeholder benefits.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Objective: Despite their rich potential, community coalitions enjoy mixed success in effecting long-term population health improvement. A need exists for strategies that augment and sustain their functional success. We undertook a study to enhance definition of the elements of coalition success and sustainability that, in turn, may foster better achievement in community-based participatory research (CBPR) and concomitant health-related outcomes. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews (N = 42) with academic researchers and their community coalition partners about the effectiveness of their collaborative endeavors. A grounded theory analysis of interview data informed the identification of domains and thematic elements influencing coalition effectiveness. Results: Seven domains emerged: (1) Characteristics related to coalition structure and processes; (2) Partner characteristics, eg, diversity, patience, flexibility, expertise; (3) Community characteristics, eg, capacity, ownership; (4) Partnership dynamics and synergy; (5) Tangible benefits; (6) Available resources, and; (7) Project characteristics. In all, 70 elements representing these domains influenced coalition effectiveness over time. Conclusions: These results extend our knowledge of factors contributing to coalition effectiveness and the sustainability of academic-community partnerships. Attention to these domains during key operational stages of CBPR initiatives is likely to have broad stakeholder benefits. |